- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 TAC vs Chameleon CR7
Fenix TK22 TAC vs Nitecore Chameleon CR7
What TK22 TAC does better (2) and where Chameleon CR7 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Brightness & throw6.7
6.7Build & durability5.3
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 TACChameleon CR7
| TK22 TAC | Chameleon CR7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 154 mm | 148 mm | +6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 40 mm | = |
| Weight | 156 g | 158 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 TAC better than Chameleon CR7?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)540 m vs 279 m+94%
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 2,500 lm+12%
Why is Chameleon CR7 better than TK22 TAC?
Chameleon CR7 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 72,900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 540 m | 279 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 49.5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 154 mm | 148 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 156 g | 158 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
