- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 TAC vs Marauder Mini
Fenix TK22 TAC vs Olight Marauder Mini
What TK22 TAC does better (3) and where Marauder Mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Brightness & throw5.9
4.9Battery & charging5.8
6.4Build & durability4.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 TACMarauder Mini
| TK22 TAC | Marauder Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 154 mm | 130 mm | +24 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 66 mm | −26 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 462 g | −306 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 TAC better than Marauder Mini?
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 700 lm4×
- Weight156 g vs 462 g3×
- Maximum runtime49.5 h vs 30 h+65%
Why is Marauder Mini better than TK22 TAC?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)540 m vs 600 m+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 72,900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 540 m | 600 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 49.5 h | 30 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 154 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 66 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 156 g | 462 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
