- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 V2.0 vs TK25 UV
Fenix TK22 V2.0 vs Fenix TK25 UV
What TK22 V2.0 does better (4) and where TK25 UV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 V2.0TK25 UV
| TK22 V2.0 | TK25 UV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 142.6 mm | +7.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 40 mm | = |
| Weight | 150 g | 156 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 V2.0 better than TK25 UV?
- Peak beam intensity41,010 cd vs 12,660 cd3.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)405 m vs 225 m+80%
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 1,000 lm+60%
- Weight150 g vs 156 g+4%
Why is TK25 UV better than TK22 V2.0?
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 110 h+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | 12,660 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 225 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 142.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 150 g | 156 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 4 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
