How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK22 V2.0 vs Li-MH

Fenix TK22 V2.0 vs Gedore Li-MH

What TK22 V2.0 does better (3) and where Li-MH wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK22 V2.0
Fenix · 2019TK22 V2.0
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
vs
Gedore Li-MH
Gedore · 2019Li-MH
4.3Score
0 advantages≈ $85
6.8Brightness & throw3.8
8.0Battery & charging2.4
5.9Build & durability3.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is TK22 V2.0 better than Li-MH?

  1. Maximum output1,600 lm vs 620 lm2.6×
  2. Maximum runtime80 h vs 3 h26.7×
  3. Weight150 g vs 295 g+97%

Why is Li-MH better than TK22 V2.0?

Li-MH has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK22 V2.0Fenix TK22 V2.0≈ $906.7
Gedore Li-MHGedore Li-MH≈ $854.3
Light output
Maximum output1,600 lm620 lm
Peak beam intensity41,010 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)405 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-40—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime80 h3 h
RechargeableYesYes
Build & durability
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height150 mm477 mm
Head diameter / width40 mm—
Body diameter / depth25.4 mm—
Weight150 g295 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels4—
SwitchDual switches—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
UV light—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare