- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK22 V2.0 vs ML300LX-S2016
Fenix TK22 V2.0 vs Maglite ML300LX-S2016
What TK22 V2.0 does better (4) and where ML300LX-S2016 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Brightness & throw4.6
6.0Build & durability2.3
3.5Light quality5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK22 V2.0ML300LX-S2016
| TK22 V2.0 | ML300LX-S2016 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 230 mm | −80 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 57 mm | −17 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 566 g | −416 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK22 V2.0 better than ML300LX-S2016?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 524 lm3.1×
- Weight150 g vs 566 g3.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)405 m vs 366 m+11%
- Maximum runtime80 h vs 69 h+16%
Why is ML300LX-S2016 better than TK22 V2.0?
ML300LX-S2016 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 524 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 41,010 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 405 m | 366 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | D |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 80 h | 69 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 230 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 57 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 150 g | 566 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
