- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK25 UV vs Angel Eyes E200
Fenix TK25 UV vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E200
What TK25 UV does better (2) and where Angel Eyes E200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Brightness & throw3.4
8.8Battery & charging5.4
5.5Build & durability7.8
3.5Light quality4.0
5.9Features5.9
Why is TK25 UV better than Angel Eyes E200?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)225 m vs 118 m+91%
- Peak beam intensity12,660 cd vs 3,480 cd3.6×
Why is Angel Eyes E200 better than TK25 UV?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,650 lm+65%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,660 cd | 3,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 225 m | 118 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 47 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 0.8 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 142.6 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Weight | 156 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 4 |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
