- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK25 vs UC35 V2.0
Fenix TK25 vs Fenix UC35 V2.0
What TK25 does better (0) and where UC35 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK25UC35 V2.0
| TK25 | UC35 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 140 mm | +3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm | +14.6 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 88 g | +68 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK25 better than UC35 V2.0?
TK25 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than TK25?
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 750 h6.8×
- Weight156 g vs 88 g+77%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)225 m vs 266 m+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 17,690 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 225 m | 266 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 750 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
