- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK25 vs TK35
Fenix TK25 vs Fenix TK35
What TK25 does better (1) and where TK35 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK25TK35
| TK25 | TK35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 159.5 mm | −16.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 48 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 272 g | −116 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK25 better than TK35?
- Weight156 g vs 272 g+74%
Why is TK35 better than TK25?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)225 m vs 480 m2.1×
- Peak beam intensity12,660 cd vs 57,600 cd4.5×
- Maximum runtime110 h vs 235 h2.1×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,300 lm+30%
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,660 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 225 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 110 h | 235 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 48 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 272 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
