- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK26R vs UC52
Fenix TK26R vs Fenix UC52
What TK26R does better (5) and where UC52 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK26RUC52
| TK26R | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 153.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm | −2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 275 g | −119 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK26R better than UC52?
- USB-C chargingYes · UC52: No
- Peak beam intensity30,620 cd vs 16,000 cd+91%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)350 m vs 253 m+38%
- Weight156 g vs 275 g+76%
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 82.5 h+21%
Why is UC52 better than TK26R?
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 3,100 lm2.1×
- Brightness levels4 vs 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 30,620 cd | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 350 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 7,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
