- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK30 vs TK35
Fenix TK30 vs Fenix TK35
What TK30 does better (4) and where TK35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK30TK35
| TK30 | TK35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 158 mm | 159.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 48 mm | −16 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 43 mm | −17 mm |
| Weight | 146 g | 272 g | −126 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK30 better than TK35?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,200 m vs 480 m2.5×
- Peak beam intensity360,000 cd vs 57,600 cd6.2×
- USB-C chargingYes · TK35: No
- Weight146 g vs 272 g+86%
Why is TK35 better than TK30?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 1,300 lm2.6×
- Maximum runtime6 h vs 235 h39.2×
- Brightness levels2 vs 52.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 360,000 cd | 57,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,200 m | 480 m |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP35 HI |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 6 h | 235 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 158 mm | 159.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 48 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | 43 mm |
| Weight | 146 g | 272 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 2 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | Yes | — |
