- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35 vs ML150LR
Fenix TK35 vs Maglite ML150LR
What TK35 does better (4) and where ML150LR wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35ML150LR
| TK35 | ML150LR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 270 mm | −110.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 50 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 272 g | 440 g | −168 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35 better than ML150LR?
- Maximum runtime235 h vs 3.2 h72.3×
- Weight272 g vs 440 g+62%
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 1,082 lm+20%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 458 m+5%
Why is ML150LR better than TK35?
ML150LR has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 1,082 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 458 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP35 HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 235 h | 3.2 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Charging time | — | 6 h |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 270 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 50 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 272 g | 440 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
