How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK35R vs Seeker 4 IPX8

Fenix TK35R vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8

What TK35R does better (3) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix TK35R
Fenix · 2025TK35R
8.7Score
3 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
Olight · 2025Seeker 4 IPX8
0 advantages≈ $140
9.0Brightness & throw8.0

Why is TK35R better than Seeker 4 IPX8?

  1. Maximum output5,800 lm vs 3,100 lm+87%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)610 m vs 400 m+52%
  3. RechargeableYes · Seeker 4 IPX8: No

Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than TK35R?

Seeker 4 IPX8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix TK35RFenix TK35R≈ $2008.7
Light output
Maximum output5,800 lm3,100 lm
Peak beam intensity93,020 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)610 m400 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25R—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs4—
Colour temperature7,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion—
Battery capacity4,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime105 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Body materialAluminiumStainless steel
Size & weight
Length / height154 mm—
Head diameter / width43 mm—
Weight342 g—
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYes—
Red lightYes—
UV lightYes—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare