- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE Fenix vs TK35UE V2.0
Fenix TK35UE Fenix vs Fenix TK35UE V2.0
What TK35UE Fenix does better (2) and where TK35UE V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw7.6
9.0Battery & charging7.2
3.0Build & durability6.0
9.0Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE FenixTK35UE V2.0
| TK35UE Fenix | TK35UE V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 143 mm | +21.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 43 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 286 g | 202 g | +84 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than TK35UE V2.0?
- Maximum runtime152 h vs 85 h+79%
- Brightness levels6 vs 5+20%
Why is TK35UE V2.0 better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 5,000 lm+56%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)300 m vs 400 m+33%
- Peak beam intensity22,500 cd vs 40,000 cd+78%
- Weight286 g vs 202 g+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,500 cd | 40,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 300 m | 400 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | 6,400K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 152 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 143 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 43 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 286 g | 202 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
