- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE Fenix vs UC52
Fenix TK35UE Fenix vs Fenix UC52
What TK35UE Fenix does better (5) and where UC52 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw5.6
9.0Battery & charging4.3
3.0Build & durability5.0
9.0Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE FenixUC52
| TK35UE Fenix | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 153.5 mm | +11 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 42 mm | +6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 26 mm | +17 mm |
| Weight | 286 g | 275 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than UC52?
- Maximum runtime152 h vs 82.5 h+84%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)300 m vs 253 m+19%
- Peak beam intensity22,500 cd vs 16,000 cd+41%
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 3,100 lm+3%
- Brightness levels6 vs 5+20%
Why is UC52 better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Weight286 g vs 275 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,500 cd | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 300 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 152 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 286 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | 5 |
| Switch | — | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
