- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35 vs UC52
Fenix TK35 vs Fenix UC52
What TK35 does better (3) and where UC52 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UC52
| TK35 | UC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 153.5 mm | +6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 42 mm | +6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 26 mm | +17 mm |
| Weight | 272 g | 275 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35 better than UC52?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)480 m vs 253 m+90%
- Peak beam intensity57,600 cd vs 16,000 cd3.6×
- Maximum runtime235 h vs 82.5 h2.8×
Why is UC52 better than TK35?
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 3,100 lm2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 57,600 cd | 16,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 480 m | 253 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP35 HI | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, AAA | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 235 h | 82.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 159.5 mm | 153.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 42 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 272 g | 275 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
