- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE Fenix vs ML150LR
Fenix TK35UE Fenix vs Maglite ML150LR
What TK35UE Fenix does better (3) and where ML150LR wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Brightness & throw6.4
9.0Battery & charging2.2
3.6Build & durability3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE FenixML150LR
| TK35UE Fenix | ML150LR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 270 mm | −105.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 50 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 286 g | 440 g | −154 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than ML150LR?
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 1,082 lm3×
- Maximum runtime152 h vs 3.2 h46.8×
- Weight286 g vs 440 g+54%
Why is ML150LR better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)300 m vs 458 m+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 1,082 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 300 m | 458 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 152 h | 3.2 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 6 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 270 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 50 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 286 g | 440 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
