- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE Fenix vs TA30C Max
Fenix TK35UE Fenix vs Nextorch TA30C Max
What TK35UE Fenix does better (1) and where TA30C Max wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw7.0
9.0Battery & charging7.3
3.0Build & durability7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE FenixTA30C Max
| TK35UE Fenix | TA30C Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 153 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 38 mm | +10 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE Fenix better than TA30C Max?
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 3,000 lm+7%
Why is TA30C Max better than TK35UE Fenix?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)300 m vs 390 m+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 22,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 300 m | 390 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 152 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 164.5 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 48 mm | 38 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 43 mm | — |
| Weight | 286 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
