- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK35UE V2.0 vs Freyr
Fenix TK35UE V2.0 vs Olight Freyr
What TK35UE V2.0 does better (2) and where Freyr wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Brightness & throw6.5
7.5Battery & charging9.7
6.1Build & durability8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK35UE V2.0Freyr
| TK35UE V2.0 | Freyr | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 143 mm | 136 mm | +7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 43 mm | 40 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK35UE V2.0 better than Freyr?
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 1,750 lm2.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)400 m vs 360 m+11%
Why is Freyr better than TK35UE V2.0?
- Maximum runtime85 h vs 360 h4.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 40,000 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 400 m | 360 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,400K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 85 h | 360 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 143 mm | 136 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 43 mm | 40 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
