- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TK72R vs TA31
Fenix TK72R vs Nextorch TA31
What TK72R does better (2) and where TA31 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TK72RTA31
| TK72R | TA31 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 156 mm | 156 mm | = |
| Head diameter / width | 59 mm | 53 mm | +6 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 50 mm | 49 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 411 g | 425 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TK72R better than TA31?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+46%
- Weight411 g vs 425 g+3%
Why is TA31 better than TK72R?
- Maximum runtime50 h vs 170 h3.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)286 m vs 380 m+33%
- Peak beam intensity20,450 cd vs 36,100 cd+77%
- Maximum output9,000 lm vs 10,000 lm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 9,000 lm | 10,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 20,450 cd | 36,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 286 m | 380 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | 170 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 156 mm | 156 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 59 mm | 53 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 50 mm | 49 mm |
| Weight | 411 g | 425 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
