- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UC35 V2.0 vs MH10 V2.0
Fenix UC35 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What UC35 V2.0 does better (2) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
UC35 V2.0MH10 V2.0
| UC35 V2.0 | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 140 mm | 130 mm | +10 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 75 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is UC35 V2.0 better than MH10 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)266 m vs 232 m+15%
- Maximum runtime750 h vs 520 h+44%
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than UC35 V2.0?
- Weight88 g vs 75 g+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 17,690 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 266 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,700K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A, AAA | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 750 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 140 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 25.4 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 23.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 88 g | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
