- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UC52 vs TA30C Max
Fenix UC52 vs Nextorch TA30C Max
What UC52 does better (1) and where TA30C Max wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
UC52TA30C Max
| UC52 | TA30C Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 153.5 mm | 153 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 42 mm | 38 mm | +4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is UC52 better than TA30C Max?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 3,000 lm+3%
Why is TA30C Max better than UC52?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)253 m vs 390 m+54%
- USB-C chargingNo · UC52: Yes
- Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,000 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 253 m | 390 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 82.5 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 153.5 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 42 mm | 38 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 275 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
