- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E ATEX vs E52C
Fenix WF11E ATEX vs Nextorch E52C
What WF11E ATEX does better (0) and where E52C wins (3) — every spec side by side.
2.8Brightness & throw5.0
Why is WF11E ATEX better than E52C?
WF11E ATEX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is E52C better than WF11E ATEX?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 3,000 lm15×
- Maximum runtime10 h vs 65 h6.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 210 m+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 10 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 30 mm |
| Weight | — | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Orange | — |
