- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E75 vs WF11E ATEX
Acebeam E75 vs Fenix WF11E ATEX
What E75 does better (3) and where WF11E ATEX wins (0) — every spec side by side.
5.6Brightness & throw2.8
Why is E75 better than WF11E ATEX?
- Maximum output4,500 lm vs 200 lm22.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)260 m vs 185 m+41%
- Maximum runtime16 h vs 10 h+60%
Why is WF11E ATEX better than E75?
WF11E ATEX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,500 lm | 200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 16,900 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 260 m | 185 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 519A | — |
| LED maker | Nichia | — |
| Number of LEDs | 51 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 3,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | AA |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 16 h | 10 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 129.3 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 28 mm | — |
| Weight | 217 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Colours | Grey, Blue, Silver, Black, Green | Orange |
