- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E ATEX vs Taschenlampe 3315 138
Fenix WF11E ATEX vs Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138
What WF11E ATEX does better (2) and where Taschenlampe 3315 138 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
3.2Brightness & throw2.7
Why is WF11E ATEX better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?
- Maximum output200 lm vs 138 lm+45%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 146 m+27%
Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than WF11E ATEX?
Taschenlampe 3315 138 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 138 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 146 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 10 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Orange | Yellow |
