- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs EX7
Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe vs Ledlenser EX7
What WF11E Intrinsically Safe does better (3) and where EX7 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Brightness & throw2.9
4.2Build & durability4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
WF11E Intrinsically SafeEX7
| WF11E Intrinsically Safe | EX7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | 162 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | 41 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 159 g | 232 g | −73 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than EX7?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)185 m vs 120 m+54%
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 45 h+56%
- Weight159 g vs 232 g+46%
Why is EX7 better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
EX7 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,560 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 185 m | 120 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1 m | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 167.5 mm | 162 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 49 mm | 41 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 24 mm | — |
| Weight | 159 g | 232 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Colours | — | Yellow |
