- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- 779.CBTPB vs WF11E Intrinsically Safe
Facom 779.CBTPB vs Fenix WF11E Intrinsically Safe
What 779.CBTPB does better (2) and where WF11E Intrinsically Safe wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Brightness & throw3.4
3.7Build & durability4.2
Why is 779.CBTPB better than WF11E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output309 lm vs 200 lm+54%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 185 m+26%
Why is WF11E Intrinsically Safe better than 779.CBTPB?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Maximum runtime51 h vs 70 h+37%
- Weight176 g vs 159 g+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 309 lm | 200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 8,560 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 233 m | 185 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AA |
| Maximum runtime | 51 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | No | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 167.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 49 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 24 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 159 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Colours | Black | — |
