- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WH23R vs Hl-Sf
Fenix WH23R vs Milwaukee Hl-Sf
What WH23R does better (3) and where Hl-Sf wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is WH23R better than Hl-Sf?
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 25 h6×
- Maximum output600 lm vs 450 lm+33%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
Why is Hl-Sf better than WH23R?
Hl-Sf has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 450 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 1.5 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 86.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 43.7 mm | — |
| Weight | 115 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
