- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WH23R vs Actik Core
Fenix WH23R vs Petzl Actik Core
What WH23R does better (3) and where Actik Core wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Brightness & throw5.4
7.8Battery & charging5.0
5.4Build & durability8.3
Why is WH23R better than Actik Core?
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+60%
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 100 h+50%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3.5 h2.3×
Why is Actik Core better than WH23R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 115 m+15%
- Maximum output600 lm vs 625 lm+4%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Peak beam intensity2,500 cd vs 3,310 cd+32%
- Weight115 g vs 88 g+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,500 cd | 3,310 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 115 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 86.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 43.7 mm | — |
| Weight | 115 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
