- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT16R vs UV
Fenix WT16R vs Format UV
What WT16R does better (2) and where UV wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT16RUV
| WT16R | UV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 127 mm | 159 mm | −32 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | 28 mm | +9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT16R better than UV?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m vs 80 m+44%
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 20 h+50%
Why is UV better than WT16R?
UV has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,310 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 115 m | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-E2 | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,800K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 127 mm | 159 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | 28 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 129 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
