- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT16R vs ML300L 3 D-Cell
Fenix WT16R vs Maglite ML300L 3 D-Cell
What WT16R does better (1) and where ML300L 3 D-Cell wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Brightness & throw6.0
4.1Build & durability2.1
Why is WT16R better than ML300L 3 D-Cell?
- Weight129 g vs 748 g5.8×
Why is ML300L 3 D-Cell better than WT16R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m vs 406 m3.5×
- Maximum output300 lm vs 625 lm2.1×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 117 h3.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 625 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,310 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 115 m | 406 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-E2 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,800K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | D |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 117 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 127 mm | 295 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 26 mm | — |
| Weight | 129 g | 748 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
