- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT20R Adjustable Angle vs ML300LX-S2016
Fenix WT20R Adjustable Angle vs Maglite ML300LX-S2016
What WT20R Adjustable Angle does better (1) and where ML300LX-S2016 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Brightness & throw4.6
5.7Build & durability2.3
2.6Light quality5.5
Why is WT20R Adjustable Angle better than ML300LX-S2016?
- Weight153 g vs 566 g3.7×
Why is ML300LX-S2016 better than WT20R Adjustable Angle?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)117 m vs 366 m3.1×
- Maximum runtime21 h vs 69 h3.3×
- Maximum output400 lm vs 524 lm+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 524 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,420 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 117 m | 366 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA, AA | D |
| Number of batteries | — | 2 |
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 21 h | 69 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 230 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 57 mm |
| Weight | 153 g | 566 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser P7 Core4.14.0vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsAS Schwabe Evo 84.13.6vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser i9 CRI4.13.7vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsWuben T103 Provs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser MT104.14.7vs
Wuben T103 ProvsMaglite ML300LX-S2016