How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. 779.CBTPB vs ML300LX-S2016

Facom 779.CBTPB vs Maglite ML300LX-S2016

What 779.CBTPB does better (1) and where ML300LX-S2016 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Facom 779.CBTPB
Facom · 2019779.CBTPB
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $70
vs
Maglite ML300LX-S2016
Maglite · 2019ML300LX-S2016
4.8Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
4.2Brightness & throw5.6
3.7Build & durability2.2

Why is 779.CBTPB better than ML300LX-S2016?

  1. Weight176 g vs 566 g3.2×

Why is ML300LX-S2016 better than 779.CBTPB?

  1. Maximum output309 lm vs 524 lm+70%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 366 m+57%
  3. Maximum runtime51 h vs 69 h+35%
Specifications

Side by side

Facom 779.CBTPBFacom 779.CBTPB≈ $704.5
Light output
Maximum output309 lm524 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m366 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)—Yes
Battery & charging
BatteryAAAD
Number of batteries—2
Maximum runtime51 h69 h
RechargeableNo—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height—230 mm
Head diameter / width—57 mm
Weight176 g566 g
Modes & features
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare