- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT20R Adjustable Angle vs Angel Eyes E200
Fenix WT20R Adjustable Angle vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E200
What WT20R Adjustable Angle does better (1) and where Angel Eyes E200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Brightness & throw3.4
2.8Battery & charging5.4
5.7Build & durability7.8
2.6Light quality4.0
5.9Features5.9
Why is WT20R Adjustable Angle better than Angel Eyes E200?
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 1,400 mAh+43%
Why is Angel Eyes E200 better than WT20R Adjustable Angle?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 1,650 lm4.1×
- USB-C chargingNo · WT20R Adjustable Angle: Yes
- Brightness levels3 vs 4+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 1,650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,420 cd | 3,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 117 m | 118 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 47 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA, AA | — |
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 21 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 0.8 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 153 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | 4 |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser P7 Core4.14.0vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsAS Schwabe Evo 84.13.6vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser i9 CRI4.13.7vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsMaglite ML300LX-S20164.14.1vs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsWuben T103 Provs
Fenix WT20R Adjustable AnglevsLedlenser MT104.14.7