- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R Adjustable Head vs E52C
Fenix WT25R Adjustable Head vs Nextorch E52C
What WT25R Adjustable Head does better (2) and where E52C wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Brightness & throw5.0
3.8Battery & charging5.7
7.0Build & durability7.1
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25R Adjustable HeadE52C
| WT25R Adjustable Head | E52C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 153 mm | −17.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24.1 mm | 30 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 130 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R Adjustable Head better than E52C?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 210 m+5%
- Peak beam intensity12,100 cd vs 11,025 cd+10%
Why is E52C better than WT25R Adjustable Head?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 3,000 lm3×
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 65 h2.2×
- Weight137 g vs 130 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,100 cd | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,550K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24.1 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 137 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
