- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R Adjustable Head vs MH10 V2.0
Fenix WT25R Adjustable Head vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0
What WT25R Adjustable Head does better (0) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Brightness & throw5.2
4.6Battery & charging9.7
7.0Build & durability8.7
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25R Adjustable HeadMH10 V2.0
| WT25R Adjustable Head | MH10 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 130 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24.1 mm | 25 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 75 g | +62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R Adjustable Head better than MH10 V2.0?
WT25R Adjustable Head has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MH10 V2.0 better than WT25R Adjustable Head?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 520 h17.9×
- Weight137 g vs 75 g+83%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 232 m+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 12,100 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 232 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-L HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,550K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 520 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 130 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24.1 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 137 g | 75 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
