- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs i9 CRI
Fenix WT25R vs Ledlenser i9 CRI
What WT25R does better (4) and where i9 CRI wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25Ri9 CRI
| WT25R | i9 CRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 187 mm | −51.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 39 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 312 g | −175 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R better than i9 CRI?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 300 lm3.3×
- Weight137 g vs 312 g2.3×
- RechargeableYes · i9 CRI: No
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 25 h+16%
Why is i9 CRI better than WT25R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 240 m+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 300 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 240 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | C |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 187 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 39 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 312 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
