- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs ML300L 2D-Cell
Fenix WT25R vs Maglite ML300L 2D-Cell
What WT25R does better (2) and where ML300L 2D-Cell wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Brightness & throw3.5
3.9Battery & charging6.8
3.8Build & durability2.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is WT25R better than ML300L 2D-Cell?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 524 lm+91%
- Weight137 g vs 566 g4.1×
Why is ML300L 2D-Cell better than WT25R?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 69 h2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 524 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 69 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 237 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | — |
| Weight | 137 g | 566 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
