- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs ML50LX 3-C-Cell
Fenix WT25R vs Maglite ML50LX 3-C-Cell
What WT25R does better (2) and where ML50LX 3-C-Cell wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Brightness & throw5.5
4.3Battery & charging8.3
4.1Build & durability2.7
Why is WT25R better than ML50LX 3-C-Cell?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 611 lm+64%
- RechargeableYes · ML50LX 3-C-Cell: No
Why is ML50LX 3-C-Cell better than WT25R?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 153 h5.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 339 m+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 611 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 339 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | C |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 153 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 260 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | — |
| Weight | 137 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
