- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WT25R vs ML300LX-S2016
Fenix WT25R vs Maglite ML300LX-S2016
What WT25R does better (2) and where ML300LX-S2016 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Brightness & throw4.6
3.4Build & durability2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
WT25RML300LX-S2016
| WT25R | ML300LX-S2016 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 230 mm | −94.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 57 mm | −28 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 566 g | −429 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WT25R better than ML300LX-S2016?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 524 lm+91%
- Weight137 g vs 566 g4.1×
Why is ML300LX-S2016 better than WT25R?
- Maximum runtime29 h vs 69 h2.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)220 m vs 366 m+66%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 524 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 220 m | 366 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | D |
| Number of batteries | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum runtime | 29 h | 69 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 135.3 mm | 230 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 29 mm | 57 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 566 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
