- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Halo AL350C vs eStar
Fox Halo AL350C vs Nextorch eStar
What Halo AL350C does better (0) and where eStar wins (1) — every spec side by side.
6.3Brightness & throw8.7
Why is Halo AL350C better than eStar?
Halo AL350C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is eStar better than Halo AL350C?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 1,300 lm2.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 10,506 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 205 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 115 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 63 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 46 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 36 mm |
| Weight | — | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
