- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Halo AL350C vs HA29 UHE MCT
Fox Halo AL350C vs Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT
What Halo AL350C does better (0) and where HA29 UHE MCT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Brightness & throw7.9
Why is Halo AL350C better than HA29 UHE MCT?
Halo AL350C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than Halo AL350C?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 1,200 lm2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 7,140 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 169 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | — | 122 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
