How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,319 models · updated Nov 2, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Halo AL350C vs UT27 MB

Fox Halo AL350C vs Nitecore UT27 MB

What Halo AL350C does better (0) and where UT27 MB wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fox Halo AL350C
Fox · 2026Halo AL350C
0 advantages≈ $65
vs
Nitecore UT27 MB
Nitecore · 2026UT27 MB
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $70
Higher score
6.3Brightness & throw7.3

Why is Halo AL350C better than UT27 MB?

Halo AL350C has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is UT27 MB better than Halo AL350C?

  1. Maximum output500 lm vs 800 lm+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output500 lm800 lm
Peak beam intensity—7,124 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—168 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs12
Colour rendering (CRI)—98
Colour temperature—3,000K
Adjustable colour temperature—Yes
Battery & charging
BatteryBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-PoAAA
Battery capacity—1,500 mAh
Maximum runtime—21 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time3 h—
Battery level indicator—Yes
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A—Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP66
Water protection (IPx)—IPx6
Impact resistance (drop)—1 m
Body materialAluminium—
Pocket clip—Yes
Size & weight
Weight—74 g
Modes & features
SOS / beacon—Yes
Red light—Yes
Lockout—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare