- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WaterLamp vs Taschenlampe 3315 138
H2Only Battery WaterLamp vs Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138
What WaterLamp does better (0) and where Taschenlampe 3315 138 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Brightness & throw3.0
Why is WaterLamp better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?
WaterLamp has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than WaterLamp?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 146 m4.2×
- Maximum output67 lm vs 138 lm2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 67 lm | 138 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 146 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 1,500 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 176 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 67 mm | — |
| Weight | 113 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Yellow |
Related comparisons
vs
ABUS Seclight TL-525vsH2Only Battery WaterLamp4.44.8
vsAcculux UniLux7vsH2Only Battery WaterLamp4.94.8
vsOrigin Outdoors TaschenlampevsH2Only Battery WaterLamp4.94.8
vsMaglite ML25LvsH2Only Battery WaterLamp5.04.8
vs
Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138vsLedlenser P5 Core
vsFenix E18R V2.0vsPeli Taschenlampe 3315 138