How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. UT10 vs WL13

Imalent UT10 vs Nextorch WL13

What UT10 does better (1) and where WL13 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Imalent UT10
Imalent · 2020UT10
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $90
vs
Nextorch WL13
Nextorch · 2022WL13
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $150
Higher score
5.9Brightness & throw6.8
2.7Build & durability5.2

Why is UT10 better than WL13?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)213 m vs 180 m+18%

Why is WL13 better than UT10?

  1. Maximum output1,160 lm vs 1,300 lm+12%
  2. Weight128 g vs 89 g+44%
  3. Peak beam intensity5,690 cd vs 8,100 cd+42%
Specifications

Side by side

Imalent UT10Imalent UT10≈ $903.9
Nextorch WL13Nextorch WL13≈ $1508.1
Light output
Maximum output1,160 lm1,300 lm
Peak beam intensity5,690 cd8,100 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)213 m180 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XP-L HI—
LED makerCree—
Battery & charging
Battery18350 Li-ion16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A
Battery capacity1,100 mAh—
Maximum runtime2 h—
RechargeableYes—
Magnetic chargingYes—
Build & durability
Protection rating—IPX7
Water protection (IPx)—IPx7
Submersible to1 m1 m
Impact resistance (drop)1 m—
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Length / height—82 mm
Head diameter / width—39 mm
Body diameter / depth—36 mm
Weight128 g89 g
Modes & features
Switch—Remote pressure switch
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare