- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- WL13 vs WL50
Nextorch WL13 vs Nextorch WL50
What WL13 does better (2) and where WL50 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WL13WL50
| WL13 | WL50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 82 mm | 125 mm | −43 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 39 mm | 44 mm | −5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | 37 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 89 g | 135 g | −46 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WL13 better than WL50?
- Maximum output1,300 lm vs 550 lm2.4×
- Weight89 g vs 135 g+52%
Why is WL50 better than WL13?
- Peak beam intensity8,100 cd vs 15,620 cd+93%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)180 m vs 250 m+39%
- Submersible to1 m vs 2 m2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,300 lm | 550 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 8,100 cd | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 180 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 1.8 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 1 m | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 82 mm | 125 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 39 mm | 44 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | 37 mm |
| Weight | 89 g | 135 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Remote pressure switch | Remote pressure switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
