- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- K6R roségold vs TUBE V2.0
Ledlenser K6R roségold vs Nitecore TUBE V2.0
What K6R roségold does better (1) and where TUBE V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Brightness & throw2.4
2.5Battery & charging6.2
Why is K6R roségold better than TUBE V2.0?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 50 lm8×
Why is TUBE V2.0 better than K6R roségold?
TUBE V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 50 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 80 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 8 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | — |
| Weight | 32 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
