- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R vs TUBE V2.0
Fenix E03R vs Nitecore TUBE V2.0
What E03R does better (1) and where TUBE V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is E03R better than TUBE V2.0?
- Maximum output260 lm vs 50 lm5.2×
Why is TUBE V2.0 better than E03R?
TUBE V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 260 lm | 50 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 440 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 42 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 18 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 47 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | — |
| Weight | 22 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
