How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stirnlampe vs I-Match 3

Mactronic Stirnlampe vs Scangrip I-Match 3

What Stirnlampe does better (3) and where I-Match 3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Mactronic Stirnlampe
Mactronic · 2025Stirnlampe
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Scangrip I-Match 3
Scangrip · 2024I-Match 3
4.7Score
0 advantages≈ $110
3.8Brightness & throw3.3
8.8Build & durability7.1

Why is Stirnlampe better than I-Match 3?

  1. Maximum output300 lm vs 250 lm+20%
  2. Maximum runtime20 h vs 15 h+33%
  3. Submersible to2 m vs 1.5 m+33%

Why is I-Match 3 better than Stirnlampe?

I-Match 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output300 lm250 lm
Light sourceLEDCOB LED panel
LED & beam
Number of LEDs—1
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Number of batteries—1
Battery capacity—1,600 mAh
Maximum runtime20 h15 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m1.5 m
Size & weight
Weight—100 g
Modes & features
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare