- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EOS 10LRW vs R3
Mares EOS 10LRW vs Seac R3
What EOS 10LRW does better (2) and where R3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
EOS 10LRWR3
| EOS 10LRW | R3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 148 mm | 140 mm | +8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 42 mm | −16 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 255 g | −77 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EOS 10LRW better than R3?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 400 lm2.5×
- Weight178 g vs 255 g+43%
Why is R3 better than EOS 10LRW?
R3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 400 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 7,300K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Maximum runtime | — | 2 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 100 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 148 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 255 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
