- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EOS Beam vs R3
Mares EOS Beam vs Seac R3
What EOS Beam does better (2) and where R3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
EOS BeamR3
| EOS Beam | R3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 158 mm | 140 mm | +18 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 42 mm | −16 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 255 g | −67 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EOS Beam better than R3?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 400 lm2.5×
- Weight188 g vs 255 g+36%
Why is R3 better than EOS Beam?
- Maximum runtime1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 400 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 1 |
| Colour temperature | — | 7,300K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 100 m | 100 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 158 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 255 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
